<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NoviTalk.org &#187; Cable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novitalk.org/category/cable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novitalk.org</link>
	<description>What Novi Michigan is talking about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 17:08:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More on AT&amp;T and PEG Channels</title>
		<link>http://www.novitalk.org/2009/03/16/more-on-att-and-peg-channels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.novitalk.org/2009/03/16/more-on-att-and-peg-channels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Willy Mena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Gov]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novitalk.org/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a previous post, I indicated how AT&amp;T has been collecting PEG fees from its customers while not providing PEG channels.  It turns out my complaint was pointed at the wrong entity. After filing a complaint with the MPSC (Michigan Public Service Commision) and speaking with folks at the Michigan Attorney General&#8217;s office, it became <a href="http://www.novitalk.org/2009/03/16/more-on-att-and-peg-channels/#more-264" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a previous post, I indicated how AT&amp;T has been collecting PEG fees from its customers while not providing PEG channels.  It turns out my complaint was pointed at the wrong entity. After filing a complaint with the MPSC (Michigan Public Service Commision) and speaking with folks at the Michigan Attorney General&#8217;s office, it became <a href="http://www.novitalk.org/2009/03/16/more-on-att-and-peg-channels/#more-264" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.novitalk.org/2009/03/16/more-on-att-and-peg-channels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumers in the crossfire</title>
		<link>http://www.novitalk.org/2009/02/24/consumers-in-the-crossfire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.novitalk.org/2009/02/24/consumers-in-the-crossfire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Willy Mena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Gov]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novitalk.org/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I changed video providers last September, switching from DirecTV to AT&amp;T Uverse.  Outside of a few initial issues, I&#8217;ve been happy with my new service. The main reasons for making the switch (aside from the cost savings) was that Uverse would offer Novi PEG (Public Education and Government) channels.  Unfortunately, it&#8217;s been about 6 months, <a href="http://www.novitalk.org/2009/02/24/consumers-in-the-crossfire/#more-233" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I changed video providers last September, switching from DirecTV to AT&amp;T Uverse.  Outside of a few initial issues, I&#8217;ve been happy with my new service. The main reasons for making the switch (aside from the cost savings) was that Uverse would offer Novi PEG (Public Education and Government) channels.  Unfortunately, it&#8217;s been about 6 months, <a href="http://www.novitalk.org/2009/02/24/consumers-in-the-crossfire/#more-233" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.novitalk.org/2009/02/24/consumers-in-the-crossfire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More AT&amp;T Bashing</title>
		<link>http://www.novitalk.org/2008/09/11/more-att-bashing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.novitalk.org/2008/09/11/more-att-bashing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Willy Mena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Gov]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novitalk.org/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ever since AT&amp;T successfully lobbied state legislators to modify the antiquated law which governed how video providers rolled services out to customers, they&#8217;ve been on the side of unfair attacks by many municipalities. My first blog entry EVER here questioned why Novi had only one cable provider. I argued that even though no one was <a href="http://www.novitalk.org/2008/09/11/more-att-bashing/#more-93" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since AT&amp;T successfully lobbied state legislators to modify the antiquated law which governed how video providers rolled services out to customers, they&#8217;ve been on the side of unfair attacks by many municipalities. My first blog entry EVER here questioned why Novi had only one cable provider. I argued that even though no one was <a href="http://www.novitalk.org/2008/09/11/more-att-bashing/#more-93" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.novitalk.org/2008/09/11/more-att-bashing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

