
A few weeks ago on a visit to Boston, we visited several historic sights for the first time. Among them were Paul Revere’s home and the Old North Church that we all learned of as children in the famous Longfellow poem.
(By the way, the “two if by sea” and the “British are coming” were poetic license, not Revere’s real words. Longfellow was related to Revere’s ancestors by marriage, but those are for another time.)
What was amazing is that these historic sites were not saved by tax dollars. Relatives, persons and groups raised thousands of dollars to purchase and restore these sites to 18th century authenticity.
Today, you pay entry fees to the Revere home, buy souvenirs at a North Church store, and make voluntary donations. This money is largely responsible for the on going maintenance of these sites.
During the April City Councils Fuerst Farm discussion, I heard Mayor Landry request that a plan to save the existing buildings must include a funding and ongoing maintenance plan. Over the past few months several have stated their desire to maintain the status quo of the Fuerst Farm. Some have publically asked who was responsible for maintaining this site in the past. A web site published a report that implicates that the city failed to “fulfill its responsibility”. To date, no financial plan for repair and on going maintenance has been presented.
Long term there needs to be a maintenance revenue plan. It’s highly unlikely that the Farm will draw a comparable level of admission fees, souvenir purchases, and donations as the Revere properties. The levels of maintenance requirements, however, are probably much closer. Are future tax payers of Novi going to be left writing this check?
If a private funding plan is required for preserving the history of one of our First Patriots, why is it so unreasonable to expect the same for the Fuerst Farm?